Mucus In Eye With Flu

examples materialist constructivism 'I: the dispositive

What is a dispositif?

definition: ". It is composed of lines of different nature" "First, it is a mess, a multi-linear ensemble,

surround these lines in the posture or surrounded not about systems, their each were homogeneous in itself: the object, language, etc.,

instead:

- they follow orientations,

- trace operations

- lines are always in disequilibrium

- you approach times to remove and another

lines are broken in and are therefore subject to changes in direction
subject lines and branch out and bifurcate and are therefore subject deviations.

Visible Items , worded statements , forces exerted and positioned subjects are vectors and tensors.

- There are three major categories: knowledge , power and subjectivity . These lines are not universal, but historically contingent.

"There Sedimentierungslinien says Foucault, but also, and Spaltungs', Bruch' lines"

And

"If you want to untangle the lines of a dispositive, we must in any case a card make, we must map out, measure unknown lands - the very thing he calls, working in the field '. One must adjust to the lines themselves, not content with being a compile dispositive, but it - from north to south, from east to west, or diagonally - to cross and carried away with itself "(p. 153).

1 +2. For Foucault, there is the curves of visibility and the curves of the statements .

dispositifs are so machines that look impressive or do that can make or speak to speak.

this visibility refers not to a light that shines on an object from the outside, but on light lines, bring out the dispositive specific figures. - One always has a light dispositive order! (The Panopticum. See without being seen and being seen, without even seeing the viewer)

The Story of a dispositive order is thus in a light and a statement of procedure that are neither subjects nor objects. Statement processes curves are spread on which differential positions and items.

Both systems have their differences, transformations and mutations. Lines to overcome this threshold, the change and transform them.

third Lines of force: These run on the other lines from one point to another, they are directed from the other lines, touching or connect to other lines. (From Seeing to speak). Dioe lines of force to thwart all places of a dispositive, SIDN crack which is invisible and ineffable and yet associated with these lines: There are lines of power as the third dimension of the dispositifs inner space.

4th Lines of subjectification: forces bend lines to form meander act on itself rather than on other lines (it creates a fold). It escapes the other lines, "gets to it," escapes: the subjectivity is a process which, although it produces a value (the subject) but was not dispositive in each is.

Deleuze the question is whether the subjectification not constituting the outermost edge of a dispositive, they arise because of power and new forms of knowledge, the dispositive break with "old" and move on to new ones. Subjectification so that would be the double of deterritorialization and reterritorialization

we have:

visibility lines, message lines, power lines , Subjektivierungslinien, Rißlinien, split lines, fault lines.

you intersect, mingle, give the other as a back vary, mutate chain, he create other lines.

For Deleuze result from this two conclusions: first

Rejection of the universals: She said nothing, but must be explained. There are no coordinates, only variation lines: objects, Subjects, the whole truth are no universals, but singular processes of objectification, subjectification, verification etc.

This means that a posture is always a multiplicity, not a condition but becoming.

This rationality is also a variety of forms. There are surely a system close to the theory. Just train the different dispositifs no balance. For Deleuze and Foucault, there is not dispositive, that could be introduced as a second-order observer ranking or rating. Instead, make up the dispositifs inherent possibilities of escape, freedom and the aesthetics, creativity etc. die Rationalität, an der sich die Entwicklung eines Dispositivs bewerten lässt (aber auch nicht anhand der Codes, sondern anhand deren Auflösungen).

2. Die Orientierung muss daher vom Ewigen zum Neuen umschenken: Das Neuartige sind keine Differenzierungen von Aussagen sondern die Fähigkeiten von Aussageordnungen hinsichtlich ihrer Selbsttransformation oder Selbstspaltung in der Zukunft. Subjektvierungslinien scheinen sich dafür besonders gut zu eignen.

Aktualität als Neuartigkeit bedeutet dabei ein in actu , ein sich im Werden befinden, das Verhältnis eines Dispositivs zu seinen Vorgängern: Es geht also um die Anteile the history and the shares of the current , the analysis and diagnostics. denotes the Archive the state that we are less and less, while the New a inactuality, a the temporal order is through breaking .

The lines of the dispositive can thus be divided as to whether they lines of stratification and sedimentation or lines are updating or creativity .

Literature:

Gilles Deleuze (1991): What is a dispositif, in Francios Ewald and Bernhard Waldenfels (Eds.): Games the truth. Michel Foucault's thinking, Frankfurt / Main: Suhrkamp, \u200b\u200bp. 153-162.