...> this is boring, I know that already <. Das ist die größte Katastrophe! Immer wieder zu sagen, > I have no idea, I want to relive <." (Heinz von Foerster)
This post is also - in particular! - Characterized by surprise, that here again found fragments of a private communication in the Sphere, which serves as a pool of public opinion. By the transformation from public to private, I can only state wins, the text can be read by another observer side and to thereby enable new / different meaning horizons. Yes and intriguing to the fact that he originally reported (to the great interests) of the person "Daniel" was the person "Lars" understood provided with meaning and is now part of the person "Lars" the same text (even with the same addressee name!) reported to be (ie the communication intention "Lars" can be assumed!) and of the person "Daniel" as a not-more-from-your-read text communicated. Where one might have said earlier: "The text has become alien to their own", one can now "according to Luhmann," say, "communicates the communication itself It is the consciousness of man, the body removed and reproduces itself!"
....----------...
on the mass of the distinctions in recent posts has been processed, is unfortunately now not be discussed due to time constraints, only I can perhaps mention two things in short
less ontological than the system theory (which starts even from an evolutionary principle = functional differentiation)
without know why there should be little ontological auszugehenen of it if it is assumed that certain things as they an observer (or two observers: Delleuze / Guattari) appear, then actually occur so in the environment ( they are there !: Yes of course! For the observer know ... "There are systems" (Luhmann)) is the deonthologisierende joke in system theory of that (and therefore also Systems theory could de facto claim as a universal theory and develop only because ) may be observed as a self-theory in itself occurring. This makes them naturally (and the claim was not raised even Luhmann) are not only possible, only truth stressful theory (there's no reason that there are several self-referential theories side by side is), but to one that uses its resources, with their ability to observe ( and that includes even and especially in sociology always this inexplicable "what" questions) can all social observers at their system-specific way.
-----------------...------------------
...und der Punkt mit der Sozialtechnologie bezieht sich darauf (NICHT auf die Aufgabe der Universalistischen Position), dass der Kritischen Theorie und der ganzen emanzipatorisch-moralischem Theorie, mit der nun an die ehemals kritische Theorie angeschlossen, ihre Zielgerichtetheit, ihre Verwertbarkeit ("Heal the world, make a better place, for me and for you (...nach meinen Vorstellungen)) schwer abzusprechen ist und der Verwertungsvorwurf sich nicht gegen eine beschreibend-bezeichnende Systemtheorie zu richten hat, es sei denn in dem Sinne, dass es dort um Wissenschaft geht und nach alles bzgl. des Codes wahr/falsch "verwertet", aber besser "beobachtet" wird.
0 comments:
Post a Comment