sister, the double tongs please ...
simple attacks, unfortunately only in one direction (Hummer is due!)
ad schizophrenia: I mean absolutely no development or adaptation, but simply state of the notion of "evolution" of a drift (ie, movement) or even denotes connotations, but which is observable only as an updated breakdown. Evolution does not seem to decide whether to flow or break now.
beloved addressee stay quiet for a moment a few inches off the ground, because I agree in the context of systems theoretical considerations on a phenomenological-analytical Level (from the side so it can no objections to the theory given as a system), but consider the concept of evolution of these same considerations for not adequately because undecidable (= "schizophrenic" in popular language use).
Since help thinking of Maturana and Varela even more limited (ascertaining numerical even if they want to make the effects of internal only)
way, there would be another question that you could perhaps save the term:
Is Evolution may therefore only observed internally, but never, however, externally? Evolution is even what one might call a first-order observation of a specific subsystem? Is there therefore a differentiation in the system, that his observation concerned only with the change of the system, although the system would be an observation of 2nd order, but certainly for the Subsystem 1ter right? Perhaps therein lies the Nichtkommunizierbarkeit the drift, because it can be communicated only ex post as the difference? But no, so the state would be the "everything is communication" Lever ...
All roads that I bestride to rescue the concept of evolution will fail.
Oh, Daniel, help! Where is the good Niklas (no, not the good Talcott) deals with the concept? Maybe you can find there a solution (or evolution)?
PS: Is there a state of apparent complexity? (Perhaps as a terrible inflation of the males on the courtship?)
0 comments:
Post a Comment